34 ms·
She did make an appeal to simplicity, claiming that simpler is better, and she stated that religious origins are way more complicated so while they can't be pro
by pronlover723 4y ago
She did make an appeal to simplicity, claiming that simpler is better, and she stated that religious origins are way more complicated so while they can't be proven wrong, if you accept the idea that simpler is better then religious explanations are unlikely to be true.
- twiss 4y agoYes, in the context of an example where the scientific method does / did work, and provides a simple explanation, namely evolution. Her argument is that in the case of the origin of the universe, the scientific method doesn't work, instead. That doesn't make the religious "method" better, but also not worse.