2 ms·

Tangentially related: FreeBSD tends to use sbuf(3) (https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sbuf https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sbuf) for anything

by trasz 4y ago

Tangentially related: FreeBSD tends to use sbuf(3) (https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sbuf https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sbuf) for anything but the very simplest string manipulation. It’s safer and more convenient than NULL-terminated strings.