3 ms·
> She redefines science to require simplicity, when it simply doesn't require it. God wills the Universe into Being. I have explained everything completely.
by jessermeyer 4y ago
> She redefines science to require simplicity, when it simply doesn't require it.
God wills the Universe into Being. I have explained everything completely. What qualities of a selection function do you have that would choose a different explanation?
One that doesn't require something more complex than the Universe to explain the Universe?
- barrysteve 4y agoWell it's not so hard to break apart all the presuppositions in that sentence, but I know you're not looking for this. Arguing tiber-river style divine simplicity is best left up to the dominican monk gregory pine and his debate partners. You might be disappointed to discover I was making a practical point, not using the ideal-metaphorical language of sabine and her culture. Practically speaking no matter where sabine and the concept of simplicity, teamwork and the coming relational tribalism goes, one can work on the ghost of the tree she is trying to chop down or drag an incomplete, complex part of science through the bubble of 'simplicity' out to disrupt the other side. Put more briefly, no matter how simple we all agree 'it' is, you can disrupt that bubble with infinite complexity, just as easily as she cuts down trees.