5 ms·
Government controlled media and censorship, what could possibly go wrong?
by spydum 4y ago
Government controlled media and censorship, what could possibly go wrong?
- AzzieElbab 4y agoUS Government is bound by first amendment, at least in theory
- zimpenfish 4y agoSuppose USGOV takes over Facebook, then is it bound by 1A for all users? Or just those in US jurisdictions? You'd surely need it to be taken over by a supra-national body like the UN, given it has a supra-national user base.
- philipov 4y agoWe could do a Bell Labs and force each nation's Facebook to be spun off into its own entity, with a federated interop protocol to connect them together. I have no delusions that such a thing would ever be allowed to happen, though.
- kamarg 4y agoPretty sure the Supreme Court has ruled that only US citizens, regardless of jurisdiction, are afforded rights laid out in the Constitution.
- gruez 4y agoNot exactly. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/904/aliens https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/904/aliens
- philipov 4y agoExactly. As long as Facebook is a private corporation, the First Amendment protects their right to arbitrarily censor the speech on their platform however they wish. The way state-controlled media censorship has turned out in other countries is well-known, but having our public spaces controlled by a patsy of the government, who is not subject to the same restrictions as the government even in theory, is not a better outcome.
- xphilter 4y agoNot really. As the owner of a site, the government controls its own speech and is not under any obligation to show “both sides” of an argument. Sure, it can’t only show your comment vs mine, but it can definitely choose which propaganda to spread.
- pclmulqdq 4y agoIt is apparently already like that with Facebook, but the government has a layer of plausible deniability. If the FBI can show up and tell Mark Zuckerberg to censor a story, that means Zuckerberg is effectively a state actor.
- qwertyuiop_ 4y agoCuba