3 ms·
Because most of those alternatives are just economic Wunderwaffen. It’s going to be a very bad landing for the common people in the West, not sure if it will al
by paganel 4y ago
Because most of those alternatives are just economic Wunderwaffen. It’s going to be a very bad landing for the common people in the West, not sure if it will also bring systemic change, but something will have to give. I just hope we’re not at the 1932 metaphorical moment.
- kergonath 4y ago> Wunderwaffen That is a great analogy. Our technologies will improve, but it is madness to voluntarily depend on future advances that might or might not happen and might or might not be practical. We need Liberty ships (cheap, effective, reliable energy production units, however imperfect), not just sit here doing nothing because we’ll somehow figure out energy storage later, or we’ve read a pop sci article touting a new technology that’s unlikely to ever be practical. We also need to realise that we need a total effort, not military but similar in scale to what we did during WWII. We need to build now all we can that is low-carbon, because half-arsing it won’t be enough. We also need to reduce consumption as much as possible. Keeping something close to a current western way of life will be hard enough, but things like humongous cars, SUVs and pickup trucks are madness. Even Teslas are very problematic and detrimental overall. So is living in the desert, and mass migrations even within countries need to be planned to avoid utter chaos. Energy production is just the sharp tip.