2 ms·
I'd say mostly the reasons are non technical. There are a lot of amateur house builders that only build their own house. For them, building a house is a one off
by jillesvangurp 4y ago
I'd say mostly the reasons are non technical. There are a lot of amateur house builders that only build their own house. For them, building a house is a one off project. There is no scaling. You build the house and you are done.
For big real estate developers, this is different. However, they have to deal with building codes, NIMBY's, and local contractors, building permits, and the occasional bit of bribes, corruption, nepotism, etc. that is ever associated with large real estate projects. There are a lot of people getting rich from the status quo.
So, standardizing practices is challenging and every project is bespoke and different. And as the article actually suggests, even larger developers don't actually build that many houses either. So, the gains from economies of scale aren't that high for them either. And they in any case have to adapt to local situations in every project.
That being said, prefab housing components are very much a thing these days. And with laminated wood, CNC cutting machines, there is not a lot you cannot construct pretty quickly. Also, it's kind of insane that e.g. a large camper van can be built in a very short amount of time (hours?) and is actually very suitable for living in. And yet we don't have a similarly efficient way of producing housing units. And of course plenty of people end up living in trailers that can't afford normal housing. And some of those aren't necessarily that bad even and they can be pretty roomy and comfortable.
I don't think it's a technical problem. If it was, it would long have been a solved problem. Society simply does not allow people to do cheap and efficient things here but forces them to buy housing at extremely high prices. Otherwise, people would do the obvious thing of getting some old trailer, container or other form of cheap shelter and use it. It's not that hard technically to build something nice that provides a decent level of comfort and shelter. Nor is it very expensive. But it's simply not allowed to do that in a lot of places.
Silicon Valley doesn't have a housing problem but a legislation problem. The same is true for Berlin where I live. Plenty of land here. They could build millions of houses, apartments, etc. here. Nice ones even. But it's not allowed.
- mike50 4y agoIn my suburban region there are 100 local building departments. I'm not kidding. There are villages that have not allowed for anything new since they were founded in the 1920s. These are inner ring suburbs that have not allowed for essentially any new construction or redevelopment for a hundred years. We literally had one local village attempt to stop the state from expanding the commuter rail system.
- nickpinkston 4y agoYes, this is 100% true, re: it's a political, not technical problem. I'm optimistic though that the YIMBY movement is actually making an impact, as evidenced by more pro-housing candidates are getting elected (in SF and across the country) and this legislation / regulations are slowly changing for the better.
- thinkharderdev 4y agoIt's still a very weird and perplexing phenomenon. Settings aside people living in old shipping containers it just seems like it wouldn't be all that hard to make prefabricated housing that looks more or less identical to houses that actually are built for dramatically cheaper.
- rdtwo 4y agoYeah but you can’t put them in places people want to live. Those places are already full and the land is parceled out. There are no economies of scale building 1-2 houses at a time in Seattle.