The actual review of the emails starts here (that was the link I originally submitted ...): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Re

The actual review of the emails starts here (that was the link I originally submitted ...): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Review_of_English_Wikimedia_fundraising_emails https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(propos... Below the emails and the discussion is an RfC, a straw poll of Wikipedia volunteers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29#RfC_%28WMF_fundraising_emails%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28prop... Current status is that – 1 Wikipedian endorses the emails, – 33 Wikipedians object to the emails, – 5 express mixed feelings. Objections are typically based on the perception that the emails mislead donors as to the current financial status of the Wikimedia Foundation; it has hundreds of millions in assets and reserves: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29#Object_to_wording_of_emails https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28prop...