I don't deny that intentional or unintentional misinformation occurs on Wikipedia. However, that does not qualify as an argument against Wikipedia as a reliable

I don't deny that intentional or unintentional misinformation occurs on Wikipedia. However, that does not qualify as an argument against Wikipedia as a reliable source as a whole, in particular in comparison to most other sources, including many TV channels, newspapers and tabloids. In fact, many if not most Wikipedia pages are written by subject matter experts too (to be defined weet that that means). In spite of occasional quality concerns, Wikipedia is one of the most trustworthy sources on the internet. That does not mean you should blindly believe everything you read there, as for any other source. Also, as stated by others, it is not a scholarly source nor a scientific publication.