2 ms·
As Mick West suggests, unless you can rule out things like insects flying past the camera, then further proof is necessary.
by Simon_O_Rourke 4y ago
As Mick West suggests, unless you can rule out things like insects flying past the camera, then further proof is necessary.
- yuvadam 4y agoDid you read the paper?
- Simon_O_Rourke 4y agoShow me where they discuss sources of error - as a paper it's poorly written, I mean what kind of academic whacks this into an abstract and decides it's OK. "We present a broad range of UAPs. We see them everywhere." Everywhere? In the cupboard at home? In the local movie theatre? Nowhere they discuss sources of error - it's a description of their setup, and then a straight dive into here's a taxonomy of all the UAPs. Plus, there's not enough there to reproduce their rig if indeed UAPs are "everywhere".