3 ms·
Without looking at the code to see what's going on, I'm wondering if this patch is actually about IPv6 NAPT, ie. protocol translation between IPv4 and IPv6. If
by seanlinmt 15y ago
Without looking at the code to see what's going on, I'm wondering if this patch is actually about IPv6 NAPT, ie. protocol translation between IPv4 and IPv6. If it's really NAT, like IPv4 NAT, then has there been an RFC on this? I can't seem to find it.
- wmf 15y agoThere wasn't an RFC for NAT44 either, because the IETF didn't want to encourage it. Realizing how that worked out last time, the debate is raging about NAT66 specification.
- adestefan 15y agoThere's a draft RFC. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-nat66-16 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-nat66-16