> I’ll probably get objections to this one, the same way I get objections to most of my articles You’ll get objections because your analysis is poor. It doesn’

> I’ll probably get objections to this one, the same way I get objections to most of my articles You’ll get objections because your analysis is poor. It doesn’t define a clear problem. When it does make claims, it demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of how the technology is and should be used. Poor take, under developed article. Im not a GQL fanboy, but appreciate it for the solutions to real problems it solves, conveniently omitted from this nonsense. This take receives a 0/5 from me. Id usually suggest that make your own assessment, but id actually recommended that you instead avoid giving it a click and move on to the next topic of the day.