2 ms·

Ads pay for the content. Do you think that journalists just work for free?

• ec109685 4y ago
  I don’t run an ad blocker for that reason. But there’s a limit to what is reasonable: https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/crime/bs-md-ci-cr-timothy-reynolds-family-to-sue-city-fatal-squeegee-worker-encounter-20220826-657yxyxcczbxdp62onjngpjyma-story.html https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/crime/bs-md-ci-cr-timothy-... https://www.baltimoresun.com/education/bs-md-student-voting-rights-20220824-20220825-idt74c57vvfmbj26cj4nflfuly-story.html https://www.baltimoresun.com/education/bs-md-student-voting-...
• dang 4y ago
  > Do you think that journalists just work for free? Can you please edit swipes out of your comments to HN? We're trying for a different sort of forum here, as described at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
• chaps 4y ago
  Journalist here: Yes I do think that journalists often work for free. Many, many journalists work for free until they "make it". It's sadly such a competitive field that it's the only way to get paid work down the line. Regardless though, the most-critical local reporting I know of is funded without advertisement or paywalls. Both newsroom and freelance journalism funding happens through grants. Funny enough, the orgs that I'm never able to get freelance work through are orgs that have paywalls and significant ads. Lots of gatekeeping when you have advertisers to appease.
• jjulius 4y ago
  I block ads and subscribe to what I consume regularly, including journalism. The two ideas are not mutually exclusive. ;)