The dogmatic opposite view is that science need not respect anything but its' self-stated goal of maximizing the acquisition of knowledge. Does anyone believe

The dogmatic opposite view is that science need not respect anything but its' self-stated goal of maximizing the acquisition of knowledge. Does anyone believe that there should be literally no boundaries to such an endeavor? Not saying that Nature's boundaries, as they've described them here, should be set in stone; they are certainly up for debate! But there's no debate that SOME legal/ethical boundaries to scientific research should exist.