Instead of bribing for votes, IMO, it's much better, and more effective, to let individuals and families decide for themselves how their charitable donations wi

Instead of bribing for votes, IMO, it's much better, and more effective, to let individuals and families decide for themselves how their charitable donations will be allocated. Local decision-making yields less fraud & waste, and it's just ... right to have charititable donations be unforced. Do fundraising, for the the hand out/up, etc. Local efforts can be both more effective and more frugal, and compatible with the freedom to use our donation $ as we see fit. The federal government has constitutionally assigned responsibilities that no other entity can fulfill. Becoming further indebted and paying individually-acquired debts, is not among them.