4 ms·
I think there's two clear criteria for what would rise to the board: Firstly, somthing that clearly raises legal liability - for example discovering a hack that
by SilverBirch 4y ago
I think there's two clear criteria for what would rise to the board: Firstly, somthing that clearly raises legal liability - for example discovering a hack that must be disclosed publicly, that sort of thing. Or something that clearly causes a rethink in strategy. Now, I could absolutely see a scenario where Mudge comes in and goes "This is terrible, we need to massively change our plan and massively increase our focus on security" and Agrawal basically disagrees. At the end of the day it's a judgement call, so it's down to Agrawal.
- peteradio 4y agoI could see a CEO getting in the way of a pretty clear board mandate and getting fired for it, maybe there needs to be a sacrificial someone to make that happen. I haven't really seen good evidence in my short tenure to believe that one man should be making all judgement calls for a business, although that is how I guess everything is structured for some reason. Thanks for the insights.