3 ms·
I guess the site can only be reached over IPv6? It seems I only have IPv4 :(
by jvdvegt 4y ago
I guess the site can only be reached over IPv6? It seems I only have IPv4 :(
- jackinloadup 4y agoSame, it begins. My ISP needs to get it's act together.
- jeroenhd 4y agoNo A record, so I guess so. If your ISP doesn't block ICMP, you can get IPv6 capabilities using tunnels like https://tunnelbroker.net/ https://tunnelbroker.net/. Especially useful if you have a router you can configure this stuff on so all of your devices get IPv6 for free. Completely free of charge and with minimal latency if you live somewhere near a data centre.
- withinboredom 4y agoNetflix and friends won’t work over them. But with some clever routing, you can get it to work… I just got native ipv6 last winter and had to use tunnels like this for years.
- zamadatix 4y agohttps://i.imgur.com/EA1uspm.png https://i.imgur.com/EA1uspm.png All of the links just go to Wikipedia and the traceroute is as shown (minus the initial hops of course)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 300bps 4y agoI think it's reasonable to assume that this whole thing has been a marketing campaign to get people to finally have a reason to switch to IPv6. All kidding aside, IPv6 isn't even required for their website or this traceroute trick. He just set up an in-addr.arpa reverse DNS zone to reverse resolve particular IP addresses to specific values. If you had a block of 20 IPv4 addresses, I don't see anything stopping you from doing the exact same thing.
- yyyk 4y ago>If you had a block of 20 IPv4 addresses, I don't see anything stopping you from doing the exact same thing. A block isn't necessary at all, even on IPv4. Traceroute can easily show internal address or just be lied to. Just recently we've seen a different example of this on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32566730 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32566730
- stonekyx 4y agoIP addresses can be lied about, but reverse DNS still needs your ownership of those IP addresses if I understand it correctly. One would need the provider of those IP addresses to setup PTR records for them.
- yyyk 4y agoYou're right. I didn't consider we don't control the other side's DNS server.
- verst 4y agoThat could be a feature if he didn't want to work at companies that don't have a IPv6 network :)
- ju-st 4y agoDoesn't seem to be the case, apple.com does not have an AAAA record. :( Also shame on Microsoft for no full IPv6 support in WSL2. (The CV posted above is outdated, this is what the traceroute shows today) 8 37 ms 36 ms 36 ms hello [2001:bc8:3eff:c0::1] 9 32 ms 32 ms 31 ms My.name.is.Louis.Poinsignon [2001:bc8:3eff:c0::2] 10 33 ms 32 ms 31 ms I.am.a.network.and.systems.engineer [2001:bc8:3eff:c0::3] 11 35 ms 36 ms 35 ms This.is.my.resume.over.traceroute [2001:bc8:3eff:c0::4] 12 37 ms 35 ms 36 ms o---Experience---o [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ee::] 13 36 ms 35 ms 35 ms 2021.Apple.Engineer.SF.USA [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ee::714] 14 33 ms 34 ms 31 ms 2018.Cloudflare.Engineer.SF.USA [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ee::cf3] 15 32 ms 34 ms 33 ms 2017.Cloudflare.Engineer.London.UK [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ee::cf2] 16 38 ms 36 ms 35 ms 2016.Cloudflare.Engineer.Intern.SF.USA [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ee::cf1] 17 36 ms 35 ms 34 ms o---Education---o [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ed::] 18 36 ms 35 ms 34 ms 2015-2016.DrexelUni.Exchange.CE.Philadelphia.USA [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ed::1] 19 37 ms 32 ms 32 ms 2011-2016.UTT.Master.CE.France [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:ed::2] 20 37 ms 34 ms 35 ms o---Skills---o [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:51::] 21 36 ms 36 ms 34 ms Golang.C.Python [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:51::1] 22 36 ms 34 ms 36 ms Networks.Linux.Automation.Kafka.Clickhouse.Kubernetes [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:51::2] 23 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms Statistics.Maths [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:51::3] 24 31 ms 32 ms 31 ms o---Various---o [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:7a::] 25 34 ms 35 ms 35 ms Swimming.Karate.Piano [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:7a::1] 26 36 ms 34 ms 35 ms o---Contact---o [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:c0::] 27 32 ms 34 ms 31 ms mail.jobs.at.poinsignon.org [2001:bc8:3eff:c0:c0::1] 28 33 ms 35 ms 30 ms cv6.poinsignon.org [2001:bc8:3eff:c0::ff]
- profmonocle 4y agoapple.com is just a redirect to www.apple.com, which does have IPv6. Apple has been slowly but surely adding IPv6 to their public network services - App Store and OS downloads come over IPv6, and their NTP resolver just added IPv6 support. I guess the department that controls that apple.com -> www.apple.com redirect just hasn't bothered, which is interesting because such a simple, dumb redirect service is one of the easiest things to dual-stack (as in it probably doesn't store IPs or have to worry about blocking at all, it just responds with a 301)