4 ms·
Wow that is a really stupid rule I wonder what they are trying to accomplish with that. More unnecessary government crap.
by bogota 4y ago
Wow that is a really stupid rule I wonder what they are trying to accomplish with that. More unnecessary government crap.
- kayodelycaon 4y agoIt gives them more data to work with because they can background check your references. And plenty of people will pick someone who won't vouch for them.
- bogota 4y agoWhy is a background check that includes references needed for a passport? Its not the governments job to determine if you are a likable person and i hope they don’t rely on those likely very shallow checks to determine anything.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- refurb 4y agoTons of fraud is why.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- bogota 4y agoHow does this reduce fraud?
- refurb 4y agoValidating identity. Canadian passport security was crap and there were several high profile cases (e.g. Millennium bomber) of them being used for terrorist activities. Your photos also need to have the name of the studio stamped and signed in the back. Government suspects fraud? Call the references (they are generally licensed professions). Suspect the photo? Call the studio or send someone down. It’s just traceability for the key claims in the application and biometric data.
- bogota 4y agoThat makes much more sense to me. Thanks for explaining.