3 ms·
It was "destroyed" by whom really? I thought the collective control of "the means of production" was such an amazing thing that it could never lead to the "dest
by kikokikokiko 4y ago
It was "destroyed" by whom really? I thought the collective control of "the means of production" was such an amazing thing that it could never lead to the "destruction" of a society that engages in it, who would have imagined.
I'm also from a poor country, but at least down here the powers that control everything weren't dumb enough to let this place become a collectivized wasteland.
Being poor is alright, at least here you can work hard and give a better life to your kids than your parents were able to give you.
Just like you know what, the cities that have a large population of german immigrants down here do. These cities have in general a GDP per capta that is 3 times larger than the average GDP in my country. It seems like those guys are just industrious, smart, and have a culture of hard work you know, who would have thought...
- dontlaugh 4y agoMost countries actually grew tremendously with collectivisation. My country got electrified, food production was vastly increased, industry was developed, large numbers of homes were built, etc. It's just that they started from very poor in the first place and developed in spite of foreign aggression by much richer countries. Rich countries force poor countries to do things all the time. There's propaganda, coups, sanctions or even outright invasion. Some countries manage to resist, like Vietnam. Others don't, like Eastern Europe or Libya. The problem isn't German workers. The problem is the economic system which subjugates workers in general and workers in poor countries in particular.
- kikokikokiko 4y agoSo who destroyed your country in 89? Maybe it was the economic system that subjugated the workers? I'm lost here. And I'm done, discussing politics/economics on the internet is the dumbest thing anyone can do, every 2 or 3 years I make this mistake. Have a nice life.