4 ms·
The fact that nuclear proponents always need to compare to coal to make it look attractive, and only consider immediate deaths as counting in case of nuclear al
by iforgotpassword 4y ago
The fact that nuclear proponents always need to compare to coal to make it look attractive, and only consider immediate deaths as counting in case of nuclear already says it all. By that measure, nobody has died from pollution from coal power plants either. Where's the hard evidence? All just coincidence and handwavy assumptions! It's from cars!
And as said, nobody has suggested replacing nuclear with coal, still most of the replies argue against that straw man.
- panick21_ 4y agoNo idea what you are talking about, I assume you are one of those people who has some delusional level of assumption about how many people radiation has killed. > Where's the hard evidence? The countless studies done on the topic that shows nuclear is incredibly safe, admits almost no CO2 and has very few other harmful emissions.