3 ms·
>I think people underestimate just how challenging the problem is Is this the shifting of the narrative? "People" aren't underestimating the problem. It's wi
by itsoktocry 4y ago
>I think people underestimate just how challenging the problem is
Is this the shifting of the narrative?
"People" aren't underestimating the problem. It's widely known to be an extremely difficult problem.
Musk said he'd have it done by now, and actually sold the technology. People have been skeptical of it for the better part of a decade.
- Robotbeat 4y agoI remain skeptical Tesla is anywhere near let-the-driver-sleep self driving (except perhaps in tunnels), but I’m very glad they’re trying to do it, and do it at scale for consumer cars, not just company-owned hyper-sensored vehicles that cost as much as a house. Literally every company working on the problem a decade ago was over-optimistic, but many pursued a strategy that would keep the technology only for company-owned vehicles, which I find less satisfactory. The whole point of personal cars is independence. We already have buses and transit vans if we want mass transit. If you want self-driving to actually save all the lives it supposedly could, it has to be scalable to everyone. Musk is terminally optimistic on AI generally, including paranoia about AGI. I don’t expect let-the-driver-sleep self driving for a good 10 years, but it’ll be never if no one tries. The technology does not advance by itself.
- DoesntMatter22 4y agoPeople are already sleeping while the Tesla drives, albeit illegally. Highway driving it seems to do really well, around town though sleeping seems way off.
- DoesntMatter22 4y agoPeople underestimate it all the time, just because you don't doesn't mean other don't. If you read any forum they talk about how it should have been solved by now.