2 ms·
She's not a politician, though. The central point remains, which is had the original headline said "Why is a prominent British film-maker Drafting [etc]" then n
by petesergeant 4y ago
She's not a politician, though. The central point remains, which is had the original headline said "Why is a prominent British film-maker Drafting [etc]" then nobody would have bothered clicking through. It's the allusion to posh British aristocracy in silly hats that's the disingenuity at the heart.
- stevenicr 4y agoI am seeing the side several are trying to point out, and sure, it's fine to educate on the issue or title inherited / given and what have you. However I must disagree with "Why is a prominent British film-maker"... nobody would click.. At least for me, and I assume many others in the US - Seeing: British X about Censorship - is a thing.. just like when we see British comedians talk about gun rights or British news people talk about Y thing. When it things in the Bill of Rights or similar documents, we are going to take influence differently than if it was British person X talks about Tea or Ships or something.