>But the article is about a group trying to support open communication, dispelling rumors and trying to tone down the rhetoric. The implication is that the com

>But the article is about a group trying to support open communication, dispelling rumors and trying to tone down the rhetoric. The implication is that the communication is not open, but propaganda. This is almost certainly the case and even if it isn't at this second it will be. How can we assume the people "dispelling rumors" even know the truth?