3 ms·
I may be mistaken, but it appears that noahc's point is about ‘keeping score to two decimal points’. There's no way we can detect some true absolute value in th
by goblin89 15y ago
I may be mistaken, but it appears that noahc's point is about ‘keeping score to two decimal points’. There's no way we can detect some true absolute value in things or deeds, but we can at least have unambiguity.
Let's be constructive: what would be a better point system?
- gbog 15y agoBetter way to value something: count how many people would want their kids to have this thing.
- noahc 15y agoThis is correct. My point was never about who has created the best life or even who added the most value. It was about a way to keep score.
- Fliko 15y agoAhh, I missed that very subtle point. Most of my experience with business comes from a taste of the music industry and reading on (most) bands struggling to make a dime, so my bias says that a good point system is the amount of fans you have, but! this clearly doesn't work for most things in life. I think the point system depends on what you are talking about, so perhaps for startups $$$ is the best point system we have available right now.