3 ms·
Well, that's the thing. I agree with you. And for very long thought Holochain was in that category, until people told me it was not and has a different approach
by rapnie 4y ago
Well, that's the thing. I agree with you. And for very long thought Holochain was in that category, until people told me it was not and has a different approach. That is explained here: https://developer.holochain.org/concepts/1_the_basics/#current-solutions https://developer.holochain.org/concepts/1_the_basics/#curre...
- verdverm 4y agoTheir speak around doesn't make them different, they are still crypto based, have a token, and spray buzzwords everywhere.
- rapnie 4y agoYes. If you want to scam, then smart thing to do is avoid the term "blockchain" or explicitly mention you are not blockchain. OTOH, if a complex project is honest, non-blockchain and has a lot of high-level concepts to explain, then the only way to verify its honesty is to deep-dive into the complex codebase. Similar to people telling me "No, Holochain is different", other people say this of Safe Network [0]. Just like until now with Holochain I stay away from that, as I just can't tell without thorough investigation. [0] https://safenetwork.tech/ https://safenetwork.tech/
- RL_Quine 4y ago> These simple building blocks create something surprisingly robust—a multicellular social organism with a memory and an immune system. It mimics the way that biological systems have managed to thrive in the face of novel threats for millions of years. Uh huh.
- rapnie 4y agoHa ha. Yeah agreed, that is.. hilarious :D
- bawolff 4y agoThis is so batshit you'd think it was someone making fun of the blockchain people.