7 ms·
Hmmmm. Are you advocating that Bitwarden was feature-complete and should never build these things out of the product they have? Because things like SSO, role as
by ThatGeoGuy 4y ago
Hmmmm. Are you advocating that Bitwarden was feature-complete and should never build these things out of the product they have? Because things like SSO, role assumption, sharing, etc. are already part of their business offering.
What I'm complaining about above is the claim:
Bitwarden is a superior replacement in every way.
which I'll add, was compared to 1Password 5. Certainly that may be true for the grandparent poster, but I've put various features that exist in 1Password 8 (as a current user) that are missing in Bitwarden.
I'm happy to disagree and say that if you want a product that only does vault storage, and neglects all business or non-user/pass combo needs - great, you can have that. But to suggest somehow that Bitwarden is that product and should remain so - well I'm afraid you're not looking at their business model. They already have SSO options (see https://bitwarden.com/products/business/ https://bitwarden.com/products/business/), audit & compliance, etc. I am being very frank about features that are missing from Bitwarden today that actual customers are looking for.
- toomuchtodo 4y agoI’m advocating for not building features if they’re not going to drive meaningful amounts of revenue. Let your competitor waste their resources doing so.
- usehackernews 4y agoI’m confused, so you’re saying BW is superior in every way because they don’t have features that don’t drive meaningful revenue? Your response to the commenter who pointed out ways in which BW is inferior was to ignore the user benefit and say they don’t drive even revenue.