> What's wrong or so difficult with just accepting W3C EBNF? Why should we do what the W3C want? Anyway - not all grammars are expressible using EBNF. For exa

> What's wrong or so difficult with just accepting W3C EBNF? Why should we do what the W3C want? Anyway - not all grammars are expressible using EBNF. For example prioritised choice.