No, not really. The "3nm" in the "3nm process" is not a measure of anything in particular, and even if it is a measure, the measure may or may not be in the nei

No, not really. The "3nm" in the "3nm process" is not a measure of anything in particular, and even if it is a measure, the measure may or may not be in the neighborhood of 3nm. Several years ago, fabs started naming each next-gen process with a smaller number of nanometers, even if the process size didn't change. It's just marketing now.