>Cloudflare has already made an editorial statement in the past I know that Cloudflare previously did this. I don't think they should be taking an editorial st

>Cloudflare has already made an editorial statement in the past I know that Cloudflare previously did this. I don't think they should be taking an editorial stance like that. My point is that it is not typical to have a CDN taking an editorial stance. It is expected that a newspaper will. >Visa and Mastercard won't processes payments from dispensaries even though they have (effectively) no limit on the number of transactions they can support. I think weed is still illegal at the federal level? Visa and MasterCard could easily be accused of facilitating a felony. This seems clear cut to me. Is Visa and MasterCard doing this in countries where weed is completely legal? >Visa and Mastercard threatened to cut-off OnlyFans unless they dropped "explicit content". Visa and MasterCard claimed they were doing it because banks require there to be proper validation against child porn. This is not Visa and MasterCard directly. Regardless, who is to blame in this situation, they are not taking an editorial stance. They are saying that OnlyFans is facilitating child porn which is against the law. I don't know about OnlyFans, but before getting threatened by Visa, PornHub clearly wasn't doing enough. They appear to have knowingly kept multiple child porn videos up even after being informed multiple times that they were child porn. Perhaps onlyfans is better than pornHub, but I doubt it. Regardless, you can't really compare on of the most heavily regulated industries with one of the least. It is not clear to me that KiwiFarms is actually violating the law or not removing illegal content. Do you have any examples of Kiwi Farm facilitating criminal behavior like PornHub and probably OnlyFans were doing?