I mean, GP was kind, the lawyer was kind. the language of "cease and desist" sounds strong and is strong, but is a requirement for protect of trademark or whate

I mean, GP was kind, the lawyer was kind. the language of "cease and desist" sounds strong and is strong, but is a requirement for protect of trademark or whatever. in this case it's no harm no foul really, or at least maybe not much. the kernel of truth is there though, this kind of stuff happens a lot, usually from big corps to little guys doing virtually no damage. in some cases really quite damaging, I don't know if any of you remember the Backcountry (outdoor gear retailer) saga from a few years ago. almost all of my friends still refuse to purchase from them because of their legal departments overzealous protection of an extremely common word "backcountry"