I disagree, I would rather the second option. In my opinion its far more damaging to allow sites like youtube to become so influencial in public life yet wield

I disagree, I would rather the second option. In my opinion its far more damaging to allow sites like youtube to become so influencial in public life yet wield the power to censor anyone they don't like. I believe that social media should be tightly bound by the constitution so that they may not overstep the rights of the people. They shouldn't be allowed to ban viewpoints they don't like. They shouldn't be allowed to unreasonably collect and use data, nor come up with agreements that allow the use of important data. Quite simply I would rather trust a government that at occasionally follows the rules than near despot oligarchs who never do.