4 ms·
Not if one of the people who would do that is currently on a boat in Lake Winnipesaukee. Not if {insert 20 other sources of complexity that exist in the real w
by afarrell 4y ago
Not if one of the people who would do that is currently on a boat in Lake Winnipesaukee.
Not if {insert 20 other sources of complexity that exist in the real world}.
- RosanaAnaDana 4y agoGive them an afternoon and then charge them a $2500 a day fine for any federally funded research not made available. They'll fix it that afternoon. I'm sure Jake can remote in from Lake Winnipesaukee. Apolegetics for bad, unethical, and world damaging polices, be it corporate or otherwise, are unacceptable.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- afarrell 4y agoIt is more important to: 1. Have a sense of proportion. 2. Respect people's work-life boundaries.
- FabHK 4y agoThis is guidance to federal agencies to update their policies to require free access for results they funded going forward. So, the issue is not to flip a switch on a server to disable a paywall. The issue is to change official policy at many agencies, which will then trickle down. You can't just retroactively change the terms on existing grants.
- geysersam 4y agoSimple solution: stop prosecuting SciHub and link to them from official websites. They've already solved this problem.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]