Okay. Then let's censor science, and put an asterisk next to every published study: "If the results had been different, they would not have been published." An

Okay. Then let's censor science, and put an asterisk next to every published study: "If the results had been different, they would not have been published." And when someone claims "research shows your prejudice is unfounded", one can justifiably answer with "because the findings have been cherry-picked to support a pre-determined conclusion. So I will trust my gut instinct, because the scientists have admitted their research is subordinate to propaganda." Though I have a feeling social science will try to be very discreet about what kind of filtering they're doing, and will hope that, when they disseminate findings they like, that we will have forgotten they're self-confessed propagandists first, and scientists second.