> Would you find it reasonable for a law to force them to continue hosting this content? Yes, at least in principle. Generally, I don't think companies should

> Would you find it reasonable for a law to force them to continue hosting this content? Yes, at least in principle. Generally, I don't think companies should have any business deciding what their customers can say. Now, if this site was sending threatening emails to Cloudflare employees, that would be a different discussion - I do believe that a company may have a right to protect its own employees from attacks. Though even here, requiring Cloudflare to go through some legal process where the senders have a chance to defend themselves before a neutral 3rd party would be a good thing. In general, the principle I'm following is that companies should have minimal rights, and definitely minimal to 0 obligations, to police their customers' behavior, outside very specific niches (e.g. AML and KYC for banks are probably important enough).