11 ms·
It would actually be lovely to have a search engine that only serves up single-creator or few-creators websites. I'm sure one exists, but I'm not aware of any.
by danielvaughn 4y ago
It would actually be lovely to have a search engine that only serves up single-creator or few-creators websites. I'm sure one exists, but I'm not aware of any.
- syeare 4y agoI haven't used it (or their browser Orion, which is allegedly better-performing and more battery-efficient than Safari), but have you tried the "premium" search engine called https://kagi.com/ https://kagi.com/ ?
- Terretta 4y agoKagi with lenses is tremendous. I recommend it elsewhere in this thread. One should subscribe to it out of support, hope, and to send a signal if nothing else. But it’s actually considerably better on most searches, perhaps similar to a mid-2000s Google, except with mild structure added that isn’t ads. (You can still !g like ddg if you feel you absolutely must.)
- qikInNdOutReply 4y agoImagine websites having a captcha, that proofs that they are handcrafted by a person, proofing the time invested, the back and forth. You could filter for that.
- dicknuckle 4y agoAre you a GPT-3?
- fumblebee 4y agoThis actually seems a reasonable enough solution to the bot problem, but doesn’t address the fake content problem. A human can still upload fake stuff.
- qikInNdOutReply 4y agoNot, if the whole creation process has been documented with a sort of internal blockchain.. From scan sketch, to open canvas, to every single brush, to convert image to upload image. You can fake that too, but the effort would be tremendous
- tspike 4y agohttps://search.marginalia.nu/ https://search.marginalia.nu/