4 ms·
> Now they should have lower fidelity audio Like most things audiophiles say: I call bullshit. http://soundexpert.org/articles/-/blogs/audio-quality-of-lightn
by joshstrange 4y ago
> Now they should have lower fidelity audio
Like most things audiophiles say: I call bullshit.
http://soundexpert.org/articles/-/blogs/audio-quality-of-lightning-to-3-5mm-headphone-jack-adapter http://soundexpert.org/articles/-/blogs/audio-quality-of-lig...
> Audio quality of Apple Lightning to 3.5mm adapter (A1749) is almost as good as in-built mobile audio solutions by Apple, though it has slightly worse df-measurements. Mostly due to the higher jitter. But if you listen music you will not hear the difference; it is too subtle to be perceived.
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoNow argue the total security of a phone with Bluetooth enabled.
- joshstrange 4y agoNow argue to the risk of stepping outside your house. Come on, the truth is almost none of us need to worry about this. To each their own and you get to pick what your balance of security and convenience but disabling bluetooth is a little too tin-foil-y for my tastes.
- 57FkMytWjyFu 4y agoDo you know that your bluetooth beacon is used to see how long you linger in front of what shelves? I'm guessing no.
- 57FkMytWjyFu 4y agoYou know these dongles increase your audio latency, right? Fidelity is faithful to both time and space. Latency is temporal distortion. (it's probably better than BT, but nothing beats a hard line)
- joshstrange 4y agoYou know the vast majority of users don't care? No one is saying you should use AirPods as your monitors while you record but for listening to music/calls/podcasts/etc they work just fine.
- tanseydavid 4y agoThis is a subjective matter. Calling it bullshit is not an accurate way of looking at it (or listening to it). There are use cases for audio where "good enough" is simply not sufficient. You may never have need for these use cases.
- joshstrange 4y ago> You may never have need for these use cases. And I'd argue the number of people who actually do have a "need" are stretching the definition of "need" to it's breaking point. Yes, if you need near-zero latency then AirPods might not be for you but that's a tiny segment of the population.
- tzs 4y agoBut in those cases you wouldn't want to use a 3.5 mm headphone jack even if your phone or computer had one. You'd want to use a digital interface such as Lightning or USB. Music on a phone or computer is digital. To get analog output for the headphone jack the device includes a DAC to convert that digital audio to analog and probably analog amplifiers to get the analog signal to the right level. The quality of the DAC and the analog amplifiers chosen by the device maker place an upper limit on the quality of the audio. To get the highest quality you want to be able to choose the DAC and amplifiers yourself.
- tanseydavid 4y agoI know what my use cases are. Why do you keep trying to tell me what I want or need?
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoThis says the Lightning to 3.5mm adapter doesn't cause meaningful quality loss. Nothing about Bluetooth, which seems to be buggy, insecure, widely-poorly-implemented..mWiFi's bastard-child.
- joshstrange 4y agoWell I was replying specifically to someone talking about the dongle being lower quality so yeah... As for Bluetooth, especially when talking about the AirPods, it works just fine for vast majority of use cases normal people have.