Why did he compare the cost of a 3090 an expensive nicety available to few gamers vs a virtual and possibly imaginary 3080 while playing games at a resolution t

Why did he compare the cost of a 3090 an expensive nicety available to few gamers vs a virtual and possibly imaginary 3080 while playing games at a resolution that could have been achieved by a 2060. It's no small difference, $1740 given by the article for a 3090 and $290 for a 2060. I've found that when decisions are somewhat arbitrary one chooses numbers that best make the argument for us. Best practice is not to pick your examples in a fashion that amounts to fudging the numbers and stick to more practical details like the fact that you can only play a fraction of the games and they can be taken away at any time or become more expensive. Altogether a nearly worthless service. A novelty without substantial value.