3 ms·
Not OP, but sometimes a problem isn't in a person's domain. Like, if you had a conversation with an engineer who knows "a little about databases" and they tell
by raffraffraff 4y ago
Not OP, but sometimes a problem isn't in a person's domain. Like, if you had a conversation with an engineer who knows "a little about databases" and they tell you that the hardware isn't up to the task, so they've had to enable disk write buffering even though they don't have battery backed caches, and they don't backup WAL logs, and the replicas are still falling behind the primaries during peak usage. Would you get stuck in yourself? Where would you start? You'd have to petition management for hardware upgrades or maybe shard the databases. This is why critical issues sometimes hang around for months or years until (if you're lucky) you have a "near miss", where a database dies, the secondary is hours behind and your untested backups didn't work for the last 2 weeks, and there's no point in time recovery anyway because there are no WAL logs. And after a 1 hour outage and major panic, someone reboots the dead primary database and or magically comes back to life. (Of course, you then have to worry about transactions that might have been lost when the system for rebooted, since the disk buffers could have had unwritten data...)
- danielmarkbruce 4y agoNot sure it's a good analogy. Poster found the vulnerability in 1. 2 is plaintext passwords. 3 it's unclear exactly what is going on. This person seems to find security issues, and cares about them. It appears to be in his/her domain.