4 ms·
Okay so apparently you have beef about concealed carry permits and want more gun freedom. Any other examples that don’t involve gun ownership as that issue is w
by mint2 4y ago
Okay so apparently you have beef about concealed carry permits and want more gun freedom. Any other examples that don’t involve gun ownership as that issue is way too debatable?
- systemvoltage 4y agoIt should not matter which particular constitutional right is violated. BoR isn't a prioritized list. Here is Bonta/CA-DOJ violating 1st Amendment and were smacked down: https://americansforprosperity.org/supreme-court-delivers-major-victory-for-americans-free-speech-rights/ https://americansforprosperity.org/supreme-court-delivers-ma... And they're busy with more! https://casetext.com/case/inst-for-free-speech-v-bonta https://casetext.com/case/inst-for-free-speech-v-bonta I've dug into Bonta and I am not writing in bad faith. I tried to see what they're up to in the best of light. Honestly, convinced that this is just pure unadulterated corruption, evil and malaise. I really hope SCOTUS holds 9th Circuit, CA District courts as well as CA DOJ in contempt of the court, it has been rarely used: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contempt_of_court https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contempt_of_court
- mint2 4y agoIt seems your viewpoint is strongly aligned with the conservative Supreme Court justices so it make sense you’re disappointed with actions of top Californian officials. In the first case you cite, Americans For Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, all 3 of the more center justices dissented. It was the conservative wing that wrote the judgement. I’m having a bit of trouble finding the exact details of the second case cited, googling it for some reason was getting a lot of references to the first case. No matter, the other two instances of “abuse” cited are only abuse from the perspective of right wing viewpoints that are more Texas than California: guns and a case where all liberal justices dissented. It’s natural that one would be dissatisfied with Californian officials if one’s opinions are out of step with the Californian electorate.