2 ms·
To be sure I understood correctly, it sounds like the WHO's plan was a good one, given the information available and outlook at the time, and it had a good chan
by lucb1e 4y ago
To be sure I understood correctly, it sounds like the WHO's plan was a good one, given the information available and outlook at the time, and it had a good chance of success, except the low chance of failure materialized? (Aside from the part where they avoided admitting defeat afterwards, although given "and besides they didn't have the big stockpiles of it anymore" it wouldn't have been a solution anyhow.)
- akira2501 4y agoThey introduced a real vulnerability throughout the entire system to deal with a perceived future vulnerability in part of the system. It might have been a good idea, depending on the details of the outlook at the time.. but the plan itself was a compromise and possibly not a particularly well modeled or tested one.