Sure, but practicing science poorly, or communicating about it naively, is not the same as being science skeptical or anti-science. That's the point. If it hel

Sure, but practicing science poorly, or communicating about it naively, is not the same as being science skeptical or anti-science. That's the point. If it helps to situate it in a different truth system: Heresy may be wrong according to the prevailing doctrine or theologically unsound, but it's still operating within the religious system of belief. Professing belief unitarianism is not atheism, and making unconvincing or unsound scientific arguments is not anti-science.