3 ms·
It's a bribe, for votes. IMO, it's much better, and more effective, to let individuals and families decide for themselves how their charitable donations will b
by lcall 4y ago
It's a bribe, for votes. IMO, it's much better, and more effective, to let individuals and families decide for themselves how their charitable donations will be allocated. Local decision-making yields less fraud & waste, and it's just ... right to have charititable donations be unforced.
.
- RhysU 4y agoThis. It didn't need to be governmental. Establish a non-profit and encourage people to contribute. Pull Obama off the bench. Use AI to resurrect Jerry Lewis. Put pleas on Tiktok or Wikipedia or wherever.
- lcall 4y agoI like how you put it. I guess I'd also say the same for any time the federal government is giving people a hand up, helping them out. And that it's not just less wasteful but more effective, locally.