6 ms·
You still haven't convinced me, or many others who used your service to the contrary, and your explanation like in this thread here doesn't match what you are p
by torpid 4y ago
You still haven't convinced me, or many others who used your service to the contrary, and your explanation like in this thread here doesn't match what you are preaching.
https://twitter.com/pkm_inc/status/1515677462251945986 https://twitter.com/pkm_inc/status/1515677462251945986
- yegg 4y agoI’m honestly not sure what you are referring to as the contrary or contradiction here. The referenced help page is the most complete explanation of how our news rankings work. Put another way, what would it take to convince you?
- torpid 4y agoYou were given a screenshot with quoted text from an article that returned completely buried results in your search engine from the same rt.com article. You first replied by giving a person a URL to the RT.com article to search in the engine which brought up a result. Then when someone called you out on it you then said you'd get back to them. Now today since I've linked this thread, you have now changed who could reply. It's pretty clear that you will say or do anything to try to save your tanking company.
- yegg 4y agoI did not change any of my Twitter settings today. Also, all I'm doing in that old thread (and this one) is doing my best to explain how our news rankings actually work. Again, currently the best and most thorough explanation is in this help page (more than can easily be put on Twitter): https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/news-rankings/ https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/ne...