3 ms·
I addressed that: > If we let the initial offset float, then the inclusive-exclusive makes sense. But you replied to someone using inclusive-inclusive for 1-b
by Jtsummers 4y ago
I addressed that:
> If we let the initial offset float, then the inclusive-exclusive makes sense.
But you replied to someone using inclusive-inclusive for 1-based arrays and complained about the delta not matching the length. Which is a nonsensical complaint, you have the length already why would you need to calculate anything?
- layer8 4y agoIn case of the subrange you don’t have the length (or you conversely have the length but not the upper bound), and you don’t want to use different conventions based on whether you process the subrange or the whole range. I’m not sure how I can make it clearer.