3 ms·

So my argument that MORE people should have to follow the CCPA is somehow an argument to prevent implementations of the CCPA. Could you please explain your log

• mistrial9 4y ago
  yes of course - the phrase is "the perfect is the enemy of the good" which means.. implementation of the law could be stalled or delayed, or the law could be challenged in court and reversed in the extreme case.. based on an argument that it is fundamentally flawed. A reason to be flawed is "not all covered parties are treated fairly" or something .. IANAL secondly, from a public relations "swindle" side, an ad campaign could be purchased that makes the argument that "this kind of law is obviously not OK" look at this ridiculous example, the State is not following the same requirements as business is.. or similar..
  • keneda7 4y ago
    So I could see your argument if in my original post I said something about the law being wrong and needs to be removed. But I was careful not do that as I agree with most of the CCPA. I simply stated it is ridiculous that this law does not apply to more people. Especially when those people just leaked 200k+ sets of PII. Again I simply said more people should have to follow the CCPA, nothing about stopping or slowing it down. Yet you choose to try and invalidate my point by connecting it to something I very clearly did not say. From my point of view it appears that you just wanted to shut down criticism of the CA government because... well I have no idea.