The leak did not just expose ccw holders. It exposed ccw applications that were denied as well. DROS info was also available for a short time. I know exactly

The leak did not just expose ccw holders. It exposed ccw applications that were denied as well. DROS info was also available for a short time. I know exactly what was exposed because I looked myself up and I also received a the letter offering the IDX monitoring. I did not make up thousands, in fact the actual number is way higher... 200k ccw holders in ca. Simple google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+CA&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS940US940&oq=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+CA&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30l3j0i390l4.3376j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+... The state AG is literally the person responsible so to say they condemned it is laughable. For example lets say I, keneda, somehow had all of your, KennyBlaken's, bank account numbers. I then pay someone to make a website with a UI to search for any of your account numbers. Then after all your account numbers publicly available and stolen I take it down and say oh I'm sorry I shouldn't have done that it was wrong. Sure I condemned the action but guess what I am still 100% responsible for making a publicly searchable user interface to expose data that is supposed to be private. The CA DOJ choose to have this searchable site made, it did not just magically appear on the internet.