4 ms·

The incident you're referring to was a concealed carry permit site that exposed data and it happened about a month or two ago, so it's premature to say "nothing

The incident you're referring to was a concealed carry permit site that exposed data and it happened about a month or two ago, so it's premature to say "nothing happened to them." The data was accessible for about 24 hours. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-06-29/california-concealed-carry-weapons-permit-data-exposed-in-leak https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-06-29/californ... You made up "thousands" as no numbers have been given . The incident has been widely condemned including by the state AG, and they're contacting anyone affected / providing credit monitoring.

staringback 4y ago
I'm sure credit monitoring will help when criminals go and break into their homes to steal their firearms
keneda7 4y ago
The leak did not just expose ccw holders. It exposed ccw applications that were denied as well. DROS info was also available for a short time. I know exactly what was exposed because I looked myself up and I also received a the letter offering the IDX monitoring. I did not make up thousands, in fact the actual number is way higher... 200k ccw holders in ca. Simple google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+CA&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS940US940&oq=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+CA&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30l3j0i390l4.3376j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+... The state AG is literally the person responsible so to say they condemned it is laughable. For example lets say I, keneda, somehow had all of your, KennyBlaken's, bank account numbers. I then pay someone to make a website with a UI to search for any of your account numbers. Then after all your account numbers publicly available and stolen I take it down and say oh I'm sorry I shouldn't have done that it was wrong. Sure I condemned the action but guess what I am still 100% responsible for making a publicly searchable user interface to expose data that is supposed to be private. The CA DOJ choose to have this searchable site made, it did not just magically appear on the internet.

staringback 4y ago

I'm sure credit monitoring will help when criminals go and break into their homes to steal their firearms

keneda7 4y ago

The leak did not just expose ccw holders. It exposed ccw applications that were denied as well. DROS info was also available for a short time. I know exactly what was exposed because I looked myself up and I also received a the letter offering the IDX monitoring. I did not make up thousands, in fact the actual number is way higher... 200k ccw holders in ca. Simple google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+CA&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS940US940&oq=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+CA&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30l3j0i390l4.3376j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+ccw+holders+are+in+... The state AG is literally the person responsible so to say they condemned it is laughable. For example lets say I, keneda, somehow had all of your, KennyBlaken's, bank account numbers. I then pay someone to make a website with a UI to search for any of your account numbers. Then after all your account numbers publicly available and stolen I take it down and say oh I'm sorry I shouldn't have done that it was wrong. Sure I condemned the action but guess what I am still 100% responsible for making a publicly searchable user interface to expose data that is supposed to be private. The CA DOJ choose to have this searchable site made, it did not just magically appear on the internet.