> e.g. "let's meet" and "let's sync" convey very different implications, to me I think the author was just using that as a set-up for the rest of the article,

> e.g. "let's meet" and "let's sync" convey very different implications, to me I think the author was just using that as a set-up for the rest of the article, and that the point was that the corp-speak version intentionally removes any implication by making it passive. The interpretation then becomes what you infer, not what was implied.