9 ms·
If you lower this to, say, 75%, a good analysis will show that a renewables grid with zero storage is possible around the world. Storage is only required for t
by colechristensen 4y ago
If you lower this to, say, 75%, a good analysis will show that a renewables grid with zero storage is possible around the world.
Storage is only required for the last n% and n is much larger than most people realize. If we accept that the energy economy will shift with supply-and-demand based pricing, what can actually happen is having peak production oversupply which will find users with its lower prices enabling off-peak-production to be high enough to meet peak demand. (this is a kind of thing that maybe needs blog posts with graphs to make the most sense)
We would be in a very much better place if we were near n and it's probably not worth worrying that much yet because n is also quite far away.
- skrause 4y agoThat was Germany's plan. Go to at least 80% renewable and fill up the rest with natural gas power plants that can change the load quickly. Oops.
- colechristensen 4y agoGermany’s problem wasn’t the end goal but the path to it.
- pydry 4y agoThat was literally everybody's plan. The alternative was to continue using coal while ramping up renewables. For all the handwringing about the turned off nuclear plants they were getting old in the tooth and wouldnt have made a substantive difference to the current crisis. New plants would take 3x as long and cost 3x as much. France is in just as much shit as germany this winter coz their nuke plants are aging out. The realistic alternatives for germany avoiding a gas crisis were dont turn off coal plants "just in case a war with russia starts" or dont try to rile up russia.
- pfdietz 4y agoThey could use hydrogen instead of natural gas. Today, green hydrogen in Europe would be cheaper per BTU than natural gas.