3 ms·
The voters decide which increments are too big. It's pretty simple -- if they would vote to prevent or roll back a given climate policy, the increment is too bi
by twblalock 4y ago
The voters decide which increments are too big. It's pretty simple -- if they would vote to prevent or roll back a given climate policy, the increment is too big.
Small incremental improvement is better than failed attempts to force through large increments resulting in no improvement or negative improvement.
- lukeschlather 4y agoThat seems like disingenuous language. Climate change is akin to an avalanche threatening our town, and we're looking to shore up the retaining wall before the avalanche gets out of control. If the incremental changes do not build a sufficiently sturdy retaining wall we might as well not bother - we will have done a lot of work and the avalanche will still destroy the town. There's no middle ground when you're talking about an existential threat.