Two things: 1. Just launch. You are about to quit anyways - so why not just launch, it obviously couldnt be worse. 2. Co-founder - I think two highly motivate

Two things: 1. Just launch. You are about to quit anyways - so why not just launch, it obviously couldnt be worse. 2. Co-founder - I think two highly motivated founders is definitely ideal - but whatever little I have seen I think more often that not one founder is a lot more motivated than the other. This also seems (but again im not sure) to be the case with Apple(jobs vs woznaik) as well as microsoft (gates vs allen). Additionally, I think this arrangement might have some advantages (vis-a-vis leadership issues) also.